Neuropeptides
Semax
A synthetic heptapeptide derived from an ACTH fragment.
- Evidence
- Early clinical
- Literature
- Mechanistic and limited clinical literature
- Family
- ACTH-fragment-derived neuropeptide
Overview
Semax is studied as a neuroactive peptide in experimental and limited clinical literature. Mechanistic work spans neurotrophic signaling, gene expression, and stress-response pathways, but the evidence base is heterogeneous and geographically concentrated.
Evidence maturity
Early human evidence
The score summarizes evidence maturity, not safety, effectiveness, or suitability for any use.
Mechanism summary
Investigated across neurotrophic, transcriptional, and stress-response signaling; no single mechanism explains the full literature.
- Research category
- Cognitive Function
- Editorial status
- Published
Evidence synthesis
Structured evidence summary
- Human studies
- 2
- Animal studies
- 7
- In vitro records
- 1
- Review records
- 5
- Abstract extracted
- 5
- Metadata verified
- 10
Evidence strength
Limited translational
Confidence
Low confidence
Major findings
- The verified set includes human-indexed records, animal ischemia and injury models, gene-expression publications, and neurotrophin-related mechanistic records.
- Atlas treats the human records as the highest-priority extraction targets and keeps animal and molecular records in separate evidence lanes.
Major limitations
- Most Phase 3 Semax additions remain metadata verified, so endpoints and effect sizes are not promoted into findings.
- Safety synthesis remains review-required because the current extracted set is not a comprehensive human safety review.
Counts are generated from verified PubMed records. Findings above are evidence-map observations, not clinical recommendations or inferred study outcomes. See the scoring methodology.
Scoring methodology
Evidence strength, quality, and confidence
Evidence strength
Compound-level strength is based on the verified study mix: human records, animal records, review or synthesis records, and extraction depth. It describes evidence maturity only.
Study quality
Study-level quality is not assessed for metadata-only records. Abstract-extracted records are rated from study design and extraction depth, not from unreviewed full-text claims.
Confidence
Confidence is capped when records remain metadata verified. Atlas does not raise confidence by counting citations without extracting endpoints, comparators, duration, and limitations.
Workflow states are `METADATA_VERIFIED`, `ABSTRACT_EXTRACTED`, `FULLTEXT_REVIEWED`, and `EDITORIAL_APPROVED`. Because full-text review is not available in this phase, no study is promoted to full-text or editorial-approved status.
Research timeline
Evidence stages describe maturity, not a chronological promise of development.
Identity and target
DocumentedThe compound identity or proposed target is described in research literature.
Preclinical research
DocumentedLaboratory or animal research forms part of the evidence base.
Human research
EmergingSome human research exists, but scope or maturity remains limited.
Independent synthesis
LimitedIndependent replication and synthesis remain important evidence gaps.
Open research questions
- 01Which findings replicate across independent research groups?
- 02How do route and formulation affect observed outcomes?
- 03Which molecular targets are direct rather than downstream?
Literature starting points
These links support further review; inclusion is not an endorsement of every indexed conclusion.
- 01Open source
Semax literature index
PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine · Database
- 02Open source
Atlas internal research database
Internal Research Database · 2026 · Database
Phase 2 study database
15 verified publications
Deep research cluster
Explore Semax by evidence question
Related comparisons
Continue the research map
