Metabolic signaling
MOTS-C
A mitochondrial-derived peptide studied in metabolic signaling.
- Evidence
- Preclinical
- Literature
- Emerging preclinical literature
- Family
- Mitochondrial-derived peptide
Overview
MOTS-C is part of an emerging class of mitochondrial-derived peptides. Research focuses on cellular stress responses, metabolic regulation, and inter-organelle communication, with much of the causal evidence still preclinical.
Evidence maturity
Early human evidence
The score summarizes evidence maturity, not safety, effectiveness, or suitability for any use.
Mechanism summary
Investigated as a mitochondrial-derived signaling peptide in cellular stress and metabolic regulation.
- Research category
- Metabolic Research
- Editorial status
- Published
Evidence synthesis
Structured evidence summary
- Human studies
- 1
- Animal studies
- 0
- In vitro records
- 0
- Review records
- 9
- Abstract extracted
- 0
- Metadata verified
- 10
Evidence strength
Limited translational
Confidence
Low confidence
Major findings
- The verified set maps MOTS-C to mitochondrial-derived peptide research involving metabolic homeostasis, nuclear signaling, aging, skeletal muscle, pulmonary fibrosis, and disease-model publications.
- MOTS-C anchors the mitochondrial-health hub as a mitochondrial-derived signaling peptide, distinct from NAD+ biochemistry and SS-31 targeting.
Major limitations
- Most MOTS-C records are review, animal, or mechanistic records rather than mature human outcome studies.
- Phase 3 additions remain metadata verified until article-level extraction is completed.
Counts are generated from verified PubMed records. Findings above are evidence-map observations, not clinical recommendations or inferred study outcomes. See the scoring methodology.
Scoring methodology
Evidence strength, quality, and confidence
Evidence strength
Compound-level strength is based on the verified study mix: human records, animal records, review or synthesis records, and extraction depth. It describes evidence maturity only.
Study quality
Study-level quality is not assessed for metadata-only records. Abstract-extracted records are rated from study design and extraction depth, not from unreviewed full-text claims.
Confidence
Confidence is capped when records remain metadata verified. Atlas does not raise confidence by counting citations without extracting endpoints, comparators, duration, and limitations.
Workflow states are `METADATA_VERIFIED`, `ABSTRACT_EXTRACTED`, `FULLTEXT_REVIEWED`, and `EDITORIAL_APPROVED`. Because full-text review is not available in this phase, no study is promoted to full-text or editorial-approved status.
Research timeline
Evidence stages describe maturity, not a chronological promise of development.
Identity and target
DocumentedThe compound identity or proposed target is described in research literature.
Preclinical research
DocumentedLaboratory or animal research forms part of the evidence base.
Human research
EmergingSome human research exists, but scope or maturity remains limited.
Independent synthesis
LimitedIndependent replication and synthesis remain important evidence gaps.
Open research questions
- 01How is endogenous production regulated across tissues?
- 02Which effects are direct versus adaptive stress responses?
- 03What measurements reliably distinguish peptide action?
Literature starting points
These links support further review; inclusion is not an endorsement of every indexed conclusion.
- 01Open source
MOTS-c literature index
PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine · Database
- 02Open source
Atlas internal research database
Internal Research Database · 2026 · Database
Phase 2 study database
10 verified publications
Deep research cluster
Explore MOTS-C by evidence question
Related comparisons
Continue the research map
